Home » Corporate » CCI decides another Lesser Penalty case in respect of cartelisation in Indian Zinc-Carbon Dry Cell Batteries Market 

CCI decides another Lesser Penalty case in respect of cartelisation in Indian Zinc-Carbon Dry Cell Batteries Market 

The Competition Commission of India (‘CCI’) passed a final order imposing penalty on Panasonic Energy India Co. Limited (‘Panasonic’) and Geep Industries (India) Private Limited (‘Geep’) for colluding to fix prices of zinc-carbon dry cell batteries in India. In respect of Panasonic, CCI granted 100 percent reduction in penalty by invoking the provisions of Section 46 of the Competition Act, 2002 (‘the Act’) read with the Competition Commission of India (Lesser Penalty) Regulations, 2009 (‘Lesser Penalty Regulations’).

The case was taken up by CCI suo motu under the provisions of Section 19 of the Act based on the disclosure made by Panasonic under Section 46 of the Act read with the Lesser Penalty Regulations. From the evidence collected in the case, which included an anti-competitive clause in the written agreement entered into between Panasonic and Geep for supply of batteries, and e-mail communications between the key managerial personnel of the two of them, CCI found existence of a bi-lateral ancillary cartel between Panasonic and Geep in the market of institutional sales of dry cell batteries. It was found that Panasonic, which had a primary cartel with Eveready Industries India Ltd. and Indo National Limited as established in Suo Motu Case No. 01 of 2016 by CCI, having fore-knowledge about the time of price increase to be affected by this primary cartel, used such fore-knowledge as leverage to negotiate and increase the basic price of the batteries sold by it to Geep. Further, Panasonic and Geep, in accordance with the prices of the primary cartel, used to agree on the market price of the batteries being sold by them, so as to maintain price parity in the market.

Based on the above, CCI found that Panasonic and Geep have indulged in the anti-competitive conduct of price co-ordination, in contravention of the provisions of Section 3 (3) (a) read with Section 3 (1) of the Act. It was observed that such conduct continued from 01.10.2010, when Panasonic and Geep entered into a written agreement, till 30.04.2016, when the last supplies were made by Panasonic to Geep.

Considering contravention of provisions of the Act, CCI computed amounts of INR 73.93 crores and INR 9.64 crores as leviable penalty on Panasonic and Geep, respectively, in terms of the proviso to Section 27 (b) of the Act. Further, considering all relevant factors, penalty on Panasonic was levied at the rate of 1.5 times of its profit for each year from mid 2010-11 to April, 2016-17, and on Geep at the rate of 4 percent of its turnover for each year from mid 2010-11 to April, 2016-17. Also, considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, penalty leviable on the individual officials of Panasonic and Geep was computed at the rate of 10 percent of the average of their income for the preceding three years. To the officials of Panasonic also, 100 percent reduction in penalty was granted under the provisions of Section 46 of the Act read with the Lesser Penalty Regulations.

About Indianindustry Media

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

x

Check Also

Committee on review of penal provisions of Company Act 2013 submits final report to Shri Arun Jaitley

The Committee constituted by Government of India in July 2018  to review the existing framework dealing ...

JSPL Foundation announces two scholarship programmes

JSPL Foundation, the CSR Arm of Jindal Steel & Power Ltd (JSPL), has announced two ...

2,25,910 companies under scanner of MCA for not filing returns for Year 2015-16 & 2-16-17

Union Minister of State for Law & Justice and Corporate Affairs Shri P.P. Chaudhary said in ...

NALCO CMD bats for MSMEs: Chartered Accountants to support MSMEs in tax compliances

India is all set to emerge as the third largest economy of the world with ...

Net Profit of Coal India Limited 

The Profit after Tax of Coal India Limited (Consolidated) for 4thquarter of FY 2017-18 was ...

Managing Business Risks in Uncertain Times

  With its vast natural resources, Odisha is ranked as a top investment destination of ...

Dr. T.K Chand receives Knowledge Excellence Award from Secretary, Mines, Govt. of India for Outstanding ...

NTPC Ltd.- profit after tax up by 10.21% 

The Country’s largest power generator – NTPC Ltd. who along with its group companies, has ...

Civil Aviation Ministry to prepare a holistic ‘Vision – 2035’ document 

          Shri Suresh Prabhu, Minister for Civil Aviation today reviewed the growth of airport infrastructure ...

Global Benchmarking helps NALCO double its Net Profit Registers Rs.1342 crore in 2017-18 against Rs.669 crore last year

On achieving the global benchmark of low cost producer in Bauxite Mining and Alumina making, ...